|
|
|
|
|
Mostly Cloudy ~ High: 88°F ~ Low: 71°F Monday, May 20, 2013 |
|
Dusting off the EPAPosted Friday, October 28, 2011, at 3:22 PM
Teaching the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) commonsense is like teaching an old dog new tricks -- tough and slow, but with a lot of work sometimes doable.
We all know the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is out of touch with American citizens, American farmers, and the agriculture community. Just recently the EPA announced it is seeking to regulate dust. Can you imagine trying to regulate dust on farms in Tennessee? Just sounds crazy. Specifically, the EPA has considered more rigorous rules for regulating Coarse Particulate Matter (PM10), or dust, even though the EPA itself estimates that there will be no benefits in regard to public health. This further highlights the disconnect the EPA has with small business and the economy. Every day I am fighting back against the unworkable rules and regulations that just don't make sense. These potential strict dust regulations are ridiculous. Regulating rural dust would mean regulating farmers' actions, driving down rural dirt roads, and other everyday activities. In Arizona, where farm dust is currently regulated, farmers are forced to park tractors on windy days to prevent getting strapped with outrageous fines. Farmers and ranchers work hard every day to grow food for our growing nation. They plant and harvest according to the weather and seasons; asking farmers to consider how much dust they may stir up as a result of farming flies in the face of common sense. This proposal by the EPA is simply outrageous. That's why I am proud to co-sponsor H.R. 1633, the Farm Dust Regulation Prevention Act of 2011, to provide regulatory certainty to the agriculture industry and American farmers. H.R. 1633 will do two main things. First, it will prevent any changes to current farm dust regulation for one year. Second, it will allow state and local governments to regulate nuisance dust (which excludes dust typical of rural areas). Only when there are no local regulations in place, the EPA can enforce regulations after they have determined a specific type of dust causes health problems. As a farmer myself, I realize the importance of this legislation. With rising input costs, an over-reaching federal government, and an unstable economy, farmers, and other small business owners need assurance to plan for the future, create jobs, and expand their operations. H.R. 1633 will give farmers certainty when it comes to job-killing EPA regulations. In conclusion - it's time to bring some Tennessee commonsense to Washington. Sincerely, Stephen L. Fincher Comments Showing comments in chronological order [Show most recent comments first] |
Stephen Fincher is the U.S. Representative for Tennessee's 8th congressional district.
Hot topics Weekly Wrap-Up(1 ~ 7:08 AM, Mar 26)
I-69 the Roadway to Jobs and Progress
Benghazi
President Obama issued 23 executive orders
Year-End Wrap Up
|
Common sense is not resisting improving a health hazard to the public associated with any given industry. If your going to tout common sense try not to sound like a chemical plant owning Senator from New Jersey. We all know no till farming dumps chemicals at multiple stages all over plants and soil. Those defoliants are in the dust Fincher wants to pretend is good ol' farmin product. HR.1633 is anti-public health and far from common sense. Maybe teaching Fincher common sense is like getting him to give a full and truthful disclosure to the Election Commission on his farm earnings and farm subsidy checks.
If the framing community wants the public to care about it. It needs to show it cares about public health. There are chemicals in that dust. IF you want to use those chemicals comply with controlling the dust. Really straight forward common sense after all.