Dyersburg, Tennessee · Saturday, November 21, 2009
[Masthead] Fair ~ 45°F  
High: 61°F ~ Low: 44°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (8) Share link

Farmers shouldering tax burden after reappraisal

Sunday, August 17, 2008
Judy Patton's fingers tapped the keys of an adding machine Friday afternoon as she calculated the property taxes for a hypothetical house.

If the house had been appraised last year for $100,000, the owner would have paid $645 in taxes, the Dyer County trustee said.

Assuming a 10 percent property value increase after the countywide reappraisal and a 10-cent increase in the property tax rate, how much would taxes be this year? A total of $646.25 - or $1.25 more, Patton said.

The example doesn't necessarily apply to everyone. Reappraisal values will determine whether a homeowner will pay more property taxes. And, 10 percent seems to be the break-even point. Homeowners are likely to pay less tax if their property values grew less than 10 percent. Those whose property values rose more than 10 percent will likely pay more taxes.

On average, Dyer County property assessments rose 19 percent, said Brian Kinsey, area appraisal manager for the Tennessee Comptroller's division of property assessments.

County Commissioner Milton Magee said he was told that residential, industrial and commercial properties increased an average of 14 percent while agricultural lands rose an average of 24 percent.

Kinsey declined to comment on that breakdown. Attempting to calculate percentages in individual property classes could be misleading. Changes in the value of a single large property can significantly affect a property class, he said Friday afternoon from his office in Jackson.

In Dyersburg, though, increases in the individual classes became an issue during a public hearing Friday on the county's proposed 2008-09 budget.

"I really do believe that agricultural land got a bad shake this time," said County Commissioner Alan Burchfiel, who had met previously with Kinsey.

Burchfiel said each reappraisal shifts the tax burden from one group of property owners to another. This time, it shifted the burden onto farmers, he said.

While Burchfiel is one of the farmers who'll be paying higher taxes, he said he plans to vote for the proposed budget and property tax rate. "I'm going to vote myself a tax increase to fund the services," he said.

Last year's property tax rate of $2.58 for every $100 of assessed property value generated more than $13 million for the county coffers. With the reappraisal and rising property values, a $2.25 tax rate will generate the same sum.

The County Commission is considering a tax rate of $2.35, which is expected to bring an additional $594,000.

County Mayor Richard Hill said county officials had submitted lean budgets and then whittled another $180,000 to offset employee raises this year. Employees will receive 3 percent raises, which will cost the county about $178,000 this year and will be a recurring cost in future years.

David Agee, a county commissioner and vice chairman of the Commission's Budget Committee, called for public comments on each section of the $44.754 million budget. Budget Committee Chairman Debbie Bradshaw Hart sat with fellow commissioners and listened.

"When we got ready to work on the budget this year, it was tougher than I thought it would be," Agee said. He noted that the budget talks began with a sobering reality: many revenue sources had failed to meet expectations. Tax collections, court fees, officials' fees and state prisoner boarding fees were all down significantly during the 2007-08 fiscal year, which ended June 30. Add the loss of Bekaert Steel Wire Corp., and the county started the 2008-09 fiscal year with a $900,000 shortfall, he said.

The county budget is divided into five main sections: a General Fund with $10.54 million in expenditures, a Highway and Public Works Fund with $5.27 million in expenditures, a General Purpose School Fund with $23.22 million in expenditures; a School Transportation Fund with $2.31 million in expenditures; and a Debt Service Fund with $3.41 million in expenditures.

When Agee called for public comments, Joe Bradford of Dyersburg asked the commissioners to consider making a statement on the inequitable gasoline prices in West Tennessee. He said Exxon gasoline cost $3.28 a gallon in Covington and $3.59 in Dyersburg on Thursday. That's a 31-cent difference. Bradford said gasoline is delivered in 9,000-gallon tankers, which means Dyer Countians pay $2,790 more for a load of gasoline than do residents of Covington.

If the county pays that kind of difference for school bus and highway equipment fuel, Bradford said the county is "getting taken to the cleaners."

Bradford suggested that a county government representative write a letter to the editor or to gas station owners about the situation.

Magee, chairman of the commission, said he would ask the budget committee to study the situation. He also suggested that Bradford meet with the school board.

The County Commission is scheduled to consider the proposed budget and property tax rate during its monthly meeting at 7 p.m. Aug. 25 in the upstairs courtroom of the Dyer County Courthouse.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on stategazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

Don't the farmer's pay a reduced rate on their

property?? They only pay taxes on the use

value instead of the market value..they

get a break that residential homeowners

don't receive.

-- Posted by yahooo on Sun, Aug 17, 2008, at 8:47 PM

how many farmers use the short form for income tax. they get credit back for taxes paid where the average person doesn't

-- Posted by sid36us on Mon, Aug 18, 2008, at 5:38 AM

Don't complain about farmers while sitting at the dinner table. Everything on the table is provided by a farmer including the cotton table cloth.

Farmers inputs are set by others, farmers income is set by others and farmers tax rates are set by others. Oh yea, they have no say about the weather either.

Maybe you want to start your work day at 5:00 AM and quit at dark 30. I doubt it.

And, no I'm not a farmer, just an apprecative consumer.

-- Posted by longdistancereader on Mon, Aug 18, 2008, at 8:13 AM

I'll agree their income depends on the weather and

many other things beyond their control but they

are given tax breaks and low interest loans when crops fail due to the risk.

I certainly don't agree with this article that the

farmers shouldering the bulk of the tax burden like the reporter states.

-- Posted by yahooo on Mon, Aug 18, 2008, at 8:28 AM

Farmers do have a different rate on their farm property. It is based on use value. All other property (home, etc.) is just like yours and mine. When the property goes out of farm use, the owner must pay 3 yrs back taxes based on what the market value would have been. Why? County government does not offer many services to a 400 acre soybean field. Most studies show for every $1.00 paid (even on use value) on farm property, the owner gets less than 11 cents in services. For every $1.00 paid on residential property, the owner gets $1.20 - $1.40+ in services. If not for farm, industrial & retail property the county would be bankrupt. As for loans, they are only available in declared disasters and you document no other lender will loan money. If you had a business and a farmer owed you $50,000 for supplies to put in a crop that died in the field, you would be glad for the gov. to loan the money to pay you back and let the farmer spend the next 15 yrs paying it off.

-- Posted by agr538 on Mon, Aug 18, 2008, at 1:46 PM

to all that complain that farmers get a break in the near future as fuel,feed,and tax rates increase for daily farm operations keep your mouths shut when 1 can of green beans cost 2 dollars instead of 50 cents be thankful.

-- Posted by owlhoot1 on Mon, Aug 18, 2008, at 7:28 PM

What services should the county provide

to a farm? Are you suggesting that farms

shouldn't be taxed because they receive

no services...except maybe paved roads

and law enforcement and fire protection? If farming is such a bad deal...why are so many farmers still buying big equipment and putting

in crops? Why is cropland selling so high? Why is pasture land being purchased and then turned into row crop?

I don't hear that bankruptcy court is full of

farmers like in the past. What changed?

Land is always, always, a good investment.

You know that.

-- Posted by yahooo on Mon, Aug 18, 2008, at 7:46 PM

Dyer county property tax rates are CHEAP. I moved from TN to TX and now pay 5X the amount in property taxes I paid in Dyer County. Not to mention the roads here are much worse than TN. I sure miss Dyer County.

-- Posted by dburgsnice on Mon, Aug 18, 2008, at 8:59 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.