Dyersburg, Tennessee · Tuesday, February 9, 2010
[Masthead] Overcast ~ 30°F  
High: 31°F ~ Low: 16°F
Print Email link Respond to editor Read comments (25) Share link

Dyersburg Cable Committee meets to voice concerns over Cable One's new programming

Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Monday morning, the city's cable committee met to voice their concerns over Cable One's decision to drop WPSD, KFVS and WBBJ from their programming on Jan. 1.

Present at the meeting were Cable One General Manager Elvis Brown and members of the city's cable committee: Freeman Dudley (chairman), Mayor John Holden, Bart Williams and Charles McCright. Also present were aldermen: Lewis Norman, Dennis Moody, Bob Kirk and Kevin Chaney. Steve Anderson (treasurer), Gleyn Twilla (city recorder) and local resident John Hamilton were also in attendance.

Chairman Dudley started the meeting off by voicing the public's displeasure in WBBJ being dropped. "I really wouldn't have a problem with 6 and 12 myself personally, but I've got a world of calls the past week on Channel 7," said Dudley. "For lots of people in this area, Channel 7 is the channel they watch." He also mentioned the fact that WBBJ is the closest station to Dyersburg and asked Brown was there any way in which he would consider not dropping WBBJ.

"Nothing is impossible," responded Brown. However, he went on to say that after weighing the options of dropping WPTY (Memphis) and WBBJ (Jackson), Cable One would be able to deliver the Memphis stations much more reliably than WBBJ.

"Ultimately that was the main reason that we made this choice; another main reason is duplication," said Brown. "They don't have all of the same programming, but I would say 75 to 85 percent of the programming is the same."

Dudley noted that the biggest thing for him was WBBJ does carry a lot of local stories from Dyersburg and the surrounding towns and for their weather coverage.

Norman reminded the committee of the significant tornadoes last February, and that he felt that WBBJ had better weather coverage than any of the Memphis stations.

"One thing that is not clear to me, Mr. Brown, is you said in your letter 'it (WBBJ) was difficult to receive because of distance.' WBBJ is probably 40 air miles from Dyersburg," said Norman. "And you addressed the issue of redundancy, what about 2 and 9, aren't they both ABC?" Committee members answered that they were both ABC.

Norman also inquired: Why was Cable One announcing a few days before Jan. 1 that they were dropping the channels?

Brown reiterated that duplication, signal strength and channel capacity were the main reasons they were dropping the channels. Brown added that he was referring to the Paducah and Cape Girardeau stations when he mentioned signal strength in his letter, noting they were over 90 air miles away from Dyersburg and were having trouble picking those up reliably.

"I realize that Jackson is within a 50-mile radius, signal strength is not as big a problem with them, but they elected the retransmission consent and the non-dup(licate) in their market. They sent me a notice back in September, stating their position," said Brown. "Dyersburg is not in the Jackson market."

Brown went on to explain that the FCC designates every county in the nation to a television broadcast market and Dyersburg has been designated to the Memphis market for decades.

"We're obligated to carry the broadcast stations in our market, since we're in the Memphis market," said Brown. "I realize how close Jackson is. Me choosing the market wasn't my doing, the FCC mandated that."

Brown also said that Cable One was operating at capacity on their bandwidth and they had to make decisions based on that. In those decisions, he said, they had to take into account they had competition from Direct TV and Dish Network and needed to add stations that customers were requesting.

Brown questioned, rather rhetorically, whether it was it necessary, the way Cable One's programming currently is, to be able to watch "Wheel of Fortune" on three different networks.

Kirk interjected that the redundant stations are good for backup, because customers are unable to get good service on channels 3, 5 and 6.

Next, Moody asked Brown what was going to be placed on channels 6, 7 and 12.

"We've got plans to add more high-def channels," said Brown. "Nothing in particular, we hadn't chose them yet."

"We just recently went through a rate increase based on the package of channels that we were offered just a couple of months ago and now you're going to take three channels off of that," said Chaney. "Are you going to take the rate increase back off? This is just another decrease in service for the price that we are paying." Chaney then noted that earlier that morning he had to switch to Channel 12 to finish watching the news program on Channel 3 due to the station going out.

Brown again said Cable One was doing away with duplicate networks.

Kirk and Chaney then pleaded with Brown not to take Channel 12 because it was the only CBS backup station.

Brown then noted he would use up all of his bandwidth if he backed up every channel he had. The aldermen asked him to just back up the ones that were problematic for the customers.

"Mr. Brown, I just can't believe the management of Cable One is doing to this community what they're doing," said Norman. "We've had a sloppy signal for pretty close to a year." Most of the aldermen agreed with Norman about the "sloppy service" and the problems with the Memphis stations over the last year.

Brown told everyone that within the last year, all of the broadcasters had to start broadcasting in digital as a test and in February the analog signal will be no more.

"The stations have been tweaking all year. Some of it has been our fault, but I'll tell you right now, 75 percent of it has been the broadcasters," said Brown. "They haven't been transmitting at high power, they've been having troubles with the transmitters. They don't let us know when they're having problems. We call them and say, 'hey, what's going on' and all of a sudden the problem clears up after the phone call. You all look at us and say, 'hey, straighten it out'."

"Well, that's who we pay every month, is you," Kirk immediately said. "We expect service, and we're not getting service from you people."

Brown then went back to Chaney's issue about a reduction in rates. He said over the years, nobody has presumably ever asked for credit because of the duplicate channels, but now they want reduced rates because of the channels being dropped. Brown said the rates would not go down.

Norman said that Cable One would probably lose some customers.

Kirk then asked Chairman Dudley if the committee had exhausted all of its efforts to try to get another vendor to take the place of Cable One. "To me that's what we ought to be doing is pursuing another vendor like ComCast or some of these others that give good service at other communities, to come in here and offer cable with good service so they'll have some competition," said Kirk.

"I think we've had an agreement with Cable One for 22 years," said Mayor Holden. "A seven-year contract that came due in August of 2008. We are currently in the middle of negotiations with their corporate office, in Phoenix, about signing an extension. We all know that AT&T, last year, received approval from the legislature to go into certain cities. Dyersburg was one of 56 cities that AT&T applied for a franchise. There is competition on the horizon, if AT&T chooses to follow through with their initial application."

Holden also noted that other vendors had shown interest in Dyersburg, but never got past initial discussions.

"We honestly get more complaints from our citizens about Cable One than almost any other thing, and it has not been resolved," Holden said to Brown. "Either it's your fault, the station's fault or whoever's fault, like Mr. Kirk said, 'we pay Cable One' and we're looking to you to try to get something resolved to help our citizens."

Brown then told the committee what bringing in another company would encompass. "That would take another company coming in and overbilling us at humungous costs," said Brown. "And some municipalities have had issues."

Kirk said he didn't want Dyersburg to be in the cable business, but there are a lot of vendors that give good service. Brown asked Kirk if he was saying that Cable One didn't give good service. "I say it stinks," said Kirk.

Moody asked if it was possible to hold off on dropping the channels on Jan. 1 to see if channels 3 and 5 clear up. Brown said that was a reasonable suggestion, but Cable One was obligated under FCC guidelines.

Cable One's negotiations and contracts with the broadcast stations will end at the end of this year and they have been in negotiations for the past month.

Brown then brought up that Cable One had to put the community on notice 30 days prior to the end of the contract they had with the broadcasters. Holden mentioned that on Dec. 1 a notice ran in the State Gazette about preliminary negotiations taking place.

"Give me a little time and this broadcast problem is going to go away," said Brown.

Brown then mentioned that he notified corporate officials that their decision to drop WBBJ would be a "hot potato" to the Dyersburg Cable One customers, but ...

"There are a lot of other elements at play here that I can't discuss, but you all are going to be some happy people here in just a little while," said Brown. "I won't tell you anything I can't deliver on."

Moody asked Brown if people on the basic lifeline plan would ever get channels to replace the three being dropped. Brown responded that Cable One would fill those channels up, but could not tell him what they would be at this time.

Currently, Brown said Cable One was in negotiations with WBBJ, but they had not worked out an agreement. The idea was brought up to see if the cable committee could negotiate with WBBJ. Brown said that they could do that, but Cable One may not agree to the terms.

Norman made note of the 5 percent franchise fee on his Cable One bill.

"It seems like we're not getting much consideration for our efforts," said Williams, noting the committee's previous efforts in trying to keep AT&T from getting a market franchise in Dyersburg.

Brown said he was going to raise his voice loud to corporate officials after the meeting, referring to the loss of WBBJ.

Kirk asked if Cable One could replace Channel 2 with Channel 7. Brown said that the agreement came out to be with WPTY out of Memphis instead of WBBJ.

The question of the fate of the PBS stations came up and Brown said they were having problems with WLJT and they would probably have a meeting regarding that.

Williams revisited the issue if the committee needed to contact WBBJ and voice its concerns. Holden said it would be best to write Cable One a letter and copy in WBBJ.

"We have the utmost confidence that you (Mr. Brown) are going to save the Jackson station for us," said McCright. "I feel that you can do it."

Mayor Holden concluded the meeting by saying the city is here to support Cable One, but there was a level of frustration noting the 6.2 percent rate increase at the first of the year and in August. And he didn't feel that Cable One corporate representatives were acknowledging issues that needed to be addressed.

The city's cable committee will reconvene (on short notice) if any positive developments take place before Jan.1.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on stategazette.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

I truely hope that Mr. Brown has the best interest at heart for Dyersburg. But in reading his comments I feel he will pull out of Dyersburg and never look back. I for one will be looking for another avenue in getting my news.

-- Posted by Unusal on Tue, Dec 30, 2008, at 3:02 PM

Does any aldermen have any back bone and stick up for the local people? Enough is enough. if cable one dont want to do what the local people wants, its time to get someone else that can?

-- Posted by jscott on Tue, Dec 30, 2008, at 3:50 PM

Come on people, Cableone could care less about what you want...they threw the hook out there again and once again the city granted them another contract...when you going to listen to what the customer wants...Cableone isn't the only cable company out there, but you city officials seem to thing so....how about more bids next time, afterall, a change may not be a bad thing...did you know, Dyersburg is the only venue for cableone in the state of Tn....makes you wonder why, doesn't it????

-- Posted by Beachvol on Tue, Dec 30, 2008, at 6:19 PM

CableOne is acting like any business. And the people of Dyersburg should start acting like customers, instead of stooges. If you don't like what CableOne does, then subscribe to a different service. It's not like they are even the cheapest option for television service. Wake up and get with the programming that satellite providers can offer, or get your "local" news from the internet--it already provides more content than any one person can consume in a lifetime!

-- Posted by ExPatDyerburgian on Tue, Dec 30, 2008, at 8:19 PM

I have been a CableOne fan for years. I buy their cable TV, phone and internet services, and have been satisfied with the services for the most part. HOWEVER, since they announced dropping WBBJ and their attitude on the subject, my loyalty is fading fast. Mr. Brown, if CableOne wants a FUTURE in Dyersburg, I suggest you LISTEN to your CUSTOMERS!

Thanks to Mr. Dudley and the other alderman for representing us.

-- Posted by gb on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 7:53 AM

They won't drop WBBJ. It would cost them too much to change their logo to read "Watch us make you frown."

-- Posted by lookhere on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 11:08 AM

Most of the service I get from Cable One is OK. I have their internet and TV service. My big complaint is the poor service from Channel 3. It has always been the worst channel on the network and always goes out during bad weather. I do know this is the fault of Channel 3 broadcasters and not Cable One. It would seem that since it is about the oldest station to be broadcasting that it would be the best. However, this is not the fact. I would love to see it replaced with Channel 12 which is nearly always clear.

I commend the aldermen for trying to help.

-- Posted by CaptainPoet on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 11:55 AM

channel 7 is the only channel i can get without cable or an antennae

let's just hope people aren't too caught up in some high def animal planet to think about that in a few weeks when severe weather breaks out and all the memphis stations are only talking about whats going on in shelby county

-- Posted by jeramy on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 2:24 PM

Well, as soon as I got the email at home about the dropping of WPSD tv and WBBJ, I sent corporate CableOne a note. No response received yet, but nonetheless, they are aware of my feelings about their decision. Below was copied directly from the FCC website:

Who decides on programs and changes in programming?

In general, the decisions concerning what services to offer and on which tier to offer those services, are within the discretion of the cable operator.

It seems to me that CableOne can somewhat try to shield themselves with the FCC, but bottom line, I don't see that the FCC regulates the fact that they are not able to 'duplicate' the network broadcasts. I personally watch the Paducah and Jackson stations because out of all the stations in Memphis, there isn't one that gives Dyersburg any attention when it comes to weather, sports, community, etc. I would like you to try watching (well I guess tonight would be your last opportunity) WPSD Local 6 out of Paducah. This channel is not only covering KY, but also, IL, MO and TN and they take the time with each state to address the weather and issues in the respective states.

It's sad that CableOne, doesn't seem to care about what the people of Dyersburg watch and want. The email sent to our homes stated that they are replacing with Regional Sports and Animal Planet HD (i believe those are correct). I don't recall getting an email or other questionaire from CableOne asking what I would like to watch.

I have already been checking to see what other options there are available, but bottom line, no matter what, we ALL still loose our LOCAL Coverage. As stated previously by ExPatDyersburgian, get your "local" news from the internet.

Perhaps this is CableOne's way of letting Dyersburg know that they don't feel we are worth their time or effort.

-- Posted by looneytooney35 on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 2:42 PM

my channel 3 reception is crystal clear.... and i have been watching CSI for two years in high def.....oh wait, i don't have cable one....i have directv....

drove through my neighborhood today and counted 25 of 34 homes were on satellite....hmmmmmmmmm

-- Posted by ukwildcats on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 3:27 PM

Some of these aldermen are speaking up for us and being frank with these bozos from Cableone. I think they deserve a pat on the back. But remember, a pat on the back is just a few inches above a kick in the butt. Find us another cable option.

-- Posted by okeena on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 4:49 PM

I hooked up to Direct T V three and a half years ago and let me tell you . My bill is cheaper than cable one, I love it it.s not been down because of weather ect no more than two hours at at a time, usually twenty minutes is the max time down. All channels are great. Direct TV is awesome compared to cable one.

-- Posted by chief_ty20 on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 5:01 PM

Direct TV, does it carry WBBJ, WMC, WREG, local news and weather or only national networks?

-- Posted by gb on Wed, Dec 31, 2008, at 6:53 PM

6 and 12 gone. WBBJ still on. Happy New Year!

-- Posted by lookhere on Thu, Jan 1, 2009, at 5:44 AM

All cable one wants is your money. we all tend to bundle bill so they get the money coming and going.

IF enough folks go to competitors perhaps then they listen.. or not.

we are but a small fish in the grand scheme of things.

-- Posted by Herbenz on Thu, Jan 1, 2009, at 6:58 AM

Can anyone tell me who offers Internet service outside of the Dyersburg city limits besides Cableone??

-- Posted by trucker889293 on Thu, Jan 1, 2009, at 8:12 AM

i have west tennessee communications wireless internet service...it has been very reliable...

-- Posted by ukwildcats on Thu, Jan 1, 2009, at 10:15 AM

Looks like CableOne is keeping WBBJ out of Jackson. Its still on this morning and its Jan. 1st. I do believe that CableOne is trying to improve in every way for there customers. CableOne has invested a lot of money in this community. Not to mention they are a very stable company in this rough time. They have a great group of people in the office and working out in the field to provide service for this community. CableOne also spends money in this community. There employees are mostly all Dyer County residence and they fill there trucks with gas in Dyersburg. They support local sports and charities too. Do you see anything from Dish or Direct other than there dishes on homes? NO you don't. So if your all about Dyersburg. Mr. Brown does promise that things are going to get better and I don't think he would say it if it weren't going to be true.

-- Posted by Fire&Rescue on Thu, Jan 1, 2009, at 11:58 AM

If you have watched the news you would see that CableOne is not the only Cable in the news. Look at Time Warner and the problem with Viacom. Its all about MONEY. I bet people with Time Warner get a rate hike on there bills.

-- Posted by Fire&Rescue on Thu, Jan 1, 2009, at 12:48 PM

If Cable One subscribers had not spoken up ch 7 would be gone too. Good job, comrades.

-- Posted by gb on Thu, Jan 1, 2009, at 4:46 PM

Oldest trick in the world - make you happy to give up the other two channels to save wbbj. They never had any intention of giving up wbbj, jeez!

-- Posted by outta*here on Thu, Jan 1, 2009, at 7:16 PM

Oh well, we enjoyed speaking up. Indulge us.

-- Posted by gb on Fri, Jan 2, 2009, at 1:47 AM

maybe you should move to newbern, we get all the memphis stations, plus jackson, paducah and cape girardeau. Charter Cable is much better then cable one. I use to live in Dyersburg but now live in Newbern. I have alot more channels on Charter cable plus all the local channels as i stated above, and i pay less for my cable and internet then i did when i lived in dyersburg on cable one. you people in dyersburg are being ripped off. If Charter can pump all these stations into Newbern why can't Cable One supply Dyersburg?? We may have a crappy mayor and some bad aldermen but at least we have more and better channels then Cable One.

-- Posted by newbernite on Fri, Jan 2, 2009, at 10:09 AM

You've convinced me. I'll take a crappy mayor and bad aldermen for good tv everytime!

-- Posted by dburg_blondie on Fri, Jan 2, 2009, at 10:35 AM

I have internet via Cable One but not Cable TV. I moved last week and cableone charged me $30.00 to move the internet service. Direct TV did not chage for the move, in fact, they gave three free months of the movie channels. I am looking into switching to AT&T DSL service. Way to stay competitive cable one (not).

-- Posted by scottydog on Sat, Jan 3, 2009, at 3:42 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.